ÌìÏÂÉúÃü¿ÆѧǰÑض¯Ì¬Öܱ¨£¨°ËÊ®Æߣ©
ÒÑ·Ö½âµÄiPSϸ°ûÓÃÓÚϸ°ûÁÆ·¨¿ÉÄܲ»±¬·¢ÃâÒßÇãÔþ
¿Æ¼¼ÈÕ±¨Science Daily 2013Äê1ÔÂ25ÈÕ£º²¨Ë¹¶Ù´óѧҽѧԺµÄÒ»ÏîʵÑéÄ£×Ó×îÐÂÑо¿Åú×¢ÓÉiPSϸ°ûÌìÉúµÄ×éÖ¯±»ÒÆÖ²»Ø»ùÒòÏàͬµÄÊÜÌåÖÐʱûÓб¬·¢ÇãÔþ·´Ó¦¡£¸ÃÑо¿ÔÚÏß½ÒÏþÔÚCell Stem Cell ÉÏ£¬Ö¤ÊµÁËiPS ¾ßÓз¢Óý³ÉÖÖÖÖÐÍϸ°ûΪ¶àÖÖ¼²²¡ºÃ±ÈÌÇÄò²¡¡¢¸ÎºÍ·Î²¿¼²²¡µÈÌṩÁÆ·¨ÇÒ²»»á±¬·¢ÇãÔþ·´Ó¦µÄ¿ÉÄÜ¡£
¸ÃÑо¿µÄÁ½Î»×ÊÉî×÷ÕßAshleigh Boyd, DPhil ºÍNeil Rodrigues, DPhil ÊDz¨Ë¹¶Ù´óѧҽѧԺƤ·ô¿Æ¸±½ÌÊÚ£¬²¨Ë¹¶Ù´óѧºÍ²¨Ë¹¶ÙÒ½ÁÆÖÐÐÄÔÙÉúҽѧÑо¿ÖÐÐĵÄÑо¿Ô±£¬Í¬Ê±Ò²Êǹú¼ÒÎÀÉúÑо¿ËùÂ޽ܕÍþÁ®Ë¹Ò½Ñ§ÖÐÐĵÄÉúÎïҽѧÓÅÒìÑо¿ÖÐÐĵÄÖ÷ÒªÑо¿Õߣ¨Â޽ܕÍþÁ®Ë¹Ò½Ñ§ÖÐÐÄÊDz¨Ë¹¶Ù´óѧµÄÒ»¸öÁÙ´²Ñо¿Á¥Êô»ú¹¹£©¡£
ͨ¹ý»ùÒò²Ù×÷£¬ÖÖÖÖ³ÉÌåϸ°ûÈçƤ·ô»òѪҺϸ°û¶¼¿ÉÄð³É¸Éϸ°û״̬£¬·¢Óý³ÉiPSϸ°û¡£iPSϸ°û¿ÉÒÔ³ÉÊ죨·Ö½â£©³ÉΪÈËÌåÄÚÖÖÖÖÀàÐ͵Äϸ°û£¬ÎªÒÆÖ²ÁÆ·¨Ìṩ¸»ºñµÄ×é֯ȪԴ£¬Ò²ÊÇÉúÎïѧÑо¿µÄÓÐÁ¦¹¤¾ß¡£¼ÈÈ»iPSϸ°û¿Éͨ¹ý»¼ÕßÌØÒìÐԵķ½·¨»ñµÃ£¬ËüÃǾÍÓ¦¸Ã¾ßÓб»»ØÖ²µ½Í³Ò»»¼ÕßÉíÉ϶ø²»»á±¬·¢ÇãÔþ·´Ó¦µÄ¿ÉÄÜÐÔ¡£¿ÉÊÇ£¬2011Äê½ÒÏþÔÚ¡¶×ÔÈ»¡·ÉϵÄһƪÑо¿È´Åú×¢¸Éϸ°û״̬ϵÄiPSϸ°û±»ÒÆÖ²µ½Í³Ò»»ùÒòÊÜÌåÉíÉϱ¬·¢ÁËÇãÔþ·´Ó¦¡£
Õâƪ¡¶×ÔÈ»¡·ÔÓÖ¾ÉϵÄÑо¿¹ûÕæÅú×¢ÓÉ»¼ÕßÌØÒìÐÔiPSϸ°ûÌìÉúµÄ×éÖ¯ÔÚÒÆÖ²ºó¿ÉÄܾßÓÐÃâÒßÔÐÔ£»µ«Rodrigues³ÆÆ䲢ûÓÐÖ±½Ó¶ÔÓÃÓÚÔÙÉúҽѧºÍÒÆÖ²ÖÐÓëÁÆЧÏà¹ØµÄ¸÷ϸ°ûÀàÐ͵ÄÃâÒßÔÐÔ¾ÙÐÐÆÀ¹À¡£
Õë¶Ô¸ÃÆÀ¹À£¬²¨Ë¹¶Ù´óѧµÄÑо¿Õß´ÓʵÑéÄ£×ÓÖÐÌáÈ¡³ÉÌåϸ°û²¢Ê¹Ö®Äð³ÉiPSϸ°û£¬È»ºóʹiPSϸ°û·Ö½âΪÈýÖÖϸ°ûÀàÐÍ£ºÉñ¾Ï¸°û¡¢¸Îϸ°ûºÍÄÚƤ£¨Ñª¹ÜÄÚƤ£©Ï¸°û¡£ÕâÈýÖÖϸ°û»®·Ö´ú±íÁËÅßÌ¥·¢ÓýÀú³ÌÖеÄÈý¸öÅ߲㣺ÖÐÅ߲㡢ÍâÅß²ãºÍÄÚÅ߲㣬À´×ÔÕâÈýÅß²ãµÄϸ°û·Ö½â²¢×îÖÕ·¢Óý³ÉÈËÌåµÄ×éÖ¯ºÍÆ÷¹Ùϵͳ¡£Í¨¹ýʹÓÃʵÑéÒªÁìÀ´·´Ó¦»¼ÕßÌØÒìÐÔiPSϸ°ûÔÚϸ°ûÁÆ·¨ÖеÄÁÙ´²Ó¦ÓÿÉÄÜÐÔ¡£Ñо¿×é°Ñ·Ö½âµÄϸ°ûÒÆÖ²µ½»ùÒòÏàͬµÄʵÑéÄ£×ÓÖУ¬Ð§¹ûûÓз¢Ã÷ÈκÎÃâÒß·´Ó¦ÔöÌí»òÇãÔþ·´Ó¦µÄÖ¢×´¡£
Ñо¿Ð§¹ûÅú×¢»¼ÕßÌØÒìÐÔiPSϸ°ûÄÜսʤÒÆÖ²ÖеÄÃâÒßÇãÔþÎÊÌ⣬¸ÃÎÊÌ⽫»áÊÇDZÔÚµÄÅß̥ϸ°ûÅÉÉúÁÆ·¨µÄÒ»ºÆ½ÙÌâ¡£ÔÚÁÙ´²ÉÏ£¬ÒÆÖ²ÖеÄÃâÒßÇãÔþÊÇͨ¹ýÃâÒßÒÖÖÆÒ©ÎïÖÎÁƵģ¬µ«ÆäÓкÜÑÏÖصĸ±·´Ó¦£¬Èç¿Éµ¼Ö°©Ö¢±¬·¢¡£
Boyd˵£º¡°ÒªÊÇ¿ÉÒÔ²»Ê¹ÓÃÃâÒßÒÖÖÆÒ©Î¶øÊÇʹÓÃÖîÈç»ùÓÚ»¼ÕßÌØÒìÐÔiPSϸ°ûµÄÁÆ·¨£¬ÄǾÍÔٺò»¹ýÁË¡£ÎÒÃǵÄЧ¹ûÊǺÜÓÐÔ¶¾°µÄ£¬Î´À´µÄÑо¿Ó¦¸Ã×ÅÁ¦ÓÚÆÀ¹ÀÈËÌåiPSϸ°ûÌìÉúµÄ×éÖ¯ÊÇ·ñͬÑùȱ·¦ÃâÒßÔÐÔ¡£¡±
µãÆÀ£º»¼ÕßÌØÒìÐÔiPSϸ°ûʵÖÊÊÇÌåϸ°ûͨ¹ý»ùÒòÖØбà³Ìºó±¬·¢µÄÐÂÎïÖÖϸ°û£¬Óë×ÔÈ»µÄ¸Éϸ°ûÓÐʵÖÊÇø±ð£¬ÔÚÌåÍâµÄ×÷ÓýÇéÐÎÏ£¬Ï¸°ûµÄÊôÐÔÒ²½«ËæÖ®¸Ä±ä£¬ÔÙÒÆÖ²È뻼ÕßÌåÄÚÒýÆðµÄÅÅÒì·´Ó¦ÊDz»¿É×èÖ¹µÄ¡£Ä³¸ö¶¯ÎïÑо¿µÄ½áÂÛ²¢²»¿É·ñ¶¨ÕâÒ»ÊÂʵ¡£
Ïà¹ØÎÄÏ×£º
Lack of Immune Response to Differentiated Cells Derived from Syngeneic Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Author: Prajna Guha1, John W. Morgan1, Gustavo Mostoslavsky2, Neil P. Rodrigues1, 2, 3, 4,
Ashleigh S. Boyd1, 2, 3, 4,
• 1 NIH Center of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) in Stem Cell Biology, Roger Williams Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Providence, RI 02908, USA
• 2 Center for Regenerative Medicine (CReM), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA
• 3 Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA
Summary
The prospects for using autologous induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) in cell replacement therapy have been tempered by evidence that undifferentiated, syngeneic mouse iPSCs are immunogenic upon transplantation. However, the immunogenicity of more therapeutically relevant differentiated cells remains unexplored. Here, we differentiated mouse iPSCs into embryoid bodies (EBs) or representative cell types spanning the three embryonic germ layers and assessed their immunogenicity in vitro and after their transplantation into syngeneic recipients. We found no evidence of increased T cell proliferation in vitro, rejection of syngeneic iPSC-derived EBs/tissue-specific cells (TSCs) after transplantation, or an antigen-specific secondary immune response. Thus, differentiated cells derived from syngeneic iPSCs do not appear to be rejected after transplantation. We also found little evidence of an immune response to undifferentiated, syngeneic iPSCs. Our data support the idea that differentiated cells generated from autologous iPSCs could be applied for cell replacement therapy without eliciting immune rejection.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193459091300009X